Hi Devs

I went through the Dushan implementation of MSMQ integration in synapse,
seems to be he has done most of things. So I think there aren't enough
stuff to continue for GSoc.
but I hope to work with Dushan and improve this feature in synapse.

/Jasintha



On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Kasun Indrasiri <kasun...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We have done some initial poc related to MSMQ integration. @Dushan, please
> add the details.
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri <raj...@wso2.com>wrote:
>
>> Yes. This will be a very interesting feature for Apache Synapse and will
>> increase the power of Synapse when comes to integration with MSMQ.
>>
>> As you may aware MSMQ is written in C++ and it has API for C/C++ and COM.
>> If a Java program wants to connect to MSMQ then there should be a JNI layer
>> which will do the Java->C++ conversion.
>>
>> First thing is to write a C++ library wrapping the MSMQ API and then a
>> transport can be implemented in Java using that API.
>>
>> If you like to work on the project you can read more about MSMQ and think
>> about how to write a C++ library for the MSMQ API and then the transport. I
>> would happy to assist you with any question you have.
>>
>> Good luck.
>>
>> Rajika
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Jasintha Dasanayaka <jasint...@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I  am interested in implementing this[1] feature in synapse as my gsoc
>>> project in this year .So could please give more details regarding this
>>> feature
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> /Jasintha
>>>
>>> [1]-  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-748
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Thanks & Regards
>>> Jasintha Dasanayake*
>>> mobile +94 772 916 596 ,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kasun Indrasiri
> Associate Technical Lead,
> WSO2 Inc. - "Lean . Enterprise . Middleware" - http://www.wso2.com/
> Blog : http://kasunpanorama.blogspot.com/
>
>


-- 
*Thanks & Regards

Jasintha Dasanayake
Software Engineer.

WSO2 Inc <http://wso2.com/>,|*http://wso2.com
*lean . enterprise . middleware*

mobile +94 772 916 596 ,

Reply via email to