On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 8:53 PM Madhawa Kasun Gunasekara < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All, > > Shall we start working on this? I believe there are so many things to > improve. so let's start listing them. after that, we can prioritize items > and create Jira tickets. > > +1. I will first work on integrating a build system (Travis or Jenkins) for Pull Requests, that will make PR merging easier. Thanks. > Thanks, > Madhawa > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 7:10 PM Madhawa Kasun Gunasekara < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1, >> Moving forward for the container friendly integration framework is a >> great idea. How about considering for version 4.x.x. release. I can help >> too. >> >> Thanks, >> Madhawa >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:38 AM Isuru Udana <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> It has been 12 years since Synapse was founded (2007-12-19). As we all >>> know in the last few years we did not have a good run. The activity of the >>> project has significantly gone down and there is not much of a contribution >>> from the majority of the committers. >>> >>> Also, ESB architectural style is no longer the preferred style for doing >>> the integration. The world has been moved towards container friendly >>> products, microservices, and cloud-native technologies. However, the >>> integration problem solved by the ESB architecture still exists and handled >>> by different entities. >>> >>> Even though Synapse is an ESB, it has most of the qualities (ex: faster >>> startup time, low resource consumption, etc.) that are important for >>> containers and microservices integrations. So with a little effort, we >>> could make Synapse a container friendly product that suits any >>> architectural style for doing the integration. >>> >>> So, should we consider positioning Synapse as an 'Integration Framework' >>> or an 'Integration Product' that serves all architectural styles? >>> Will that help us reactivate the project? >>> >>> Please share your thoughts. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: Isuru Udana <[email protected]> >>> Date: Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 7:03 AM >>> Subject: Re: Positioning Synapse as an Integration Framework >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> I will open this discussion to the community to reach a wide audience. >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 5:20 AM Vanjikumaran Sivajothy < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I am not too sure about adopting the very abstract term Integration >>>> Framework; However, I can assure that moving towards container-native >>>> is a >>>> logical move. >>>> I can help on this to produce an initial set of artifacts. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 4:23 PM Isuru Udana <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi PMC, >>>> > >>>> > It has been 12 years since Synapse was founded (2007-12-19). As we >>>> all know >>>> > in the last few years we did not have a good run. The activity of the >>>> > project has significantly gone down and there is not much of a >>>> contribution >>>> > from the majority of the committers/PMC members. >>>> > >>>> > Also, ESB architectural style is no longer the preferred style for >>>> doing >>>> > the integration. The world has been moved towards container friendly >>>> > products, microservices, and cloud-native technologies. However, the >>>> > integration problem solved by the ESB architecture still exists and >>>> handled >>>> > by different entities. >>>> > >>>> > Even though Synapse is an ESB, it has most of the qualities (ex: >>>> faster >>>> > startup time, low resource consumption, etc.) that are important for >>>> > containers and microservices integrations. So with a little effort, we >>>> > could make Synapse a container friendly product that suits any >>>> > architectural style for doing the integration. >>>> > >>>> > So, should we consider positioning Synapse as an 'Integration >>>> Framework' or >>>> > an 'Integration Product' that serves all architectural styles? >>>> > Will that help us reactivate the project? >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > *Isuru Udana* >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > *email: [email protected] <[email protected]> blog: >>>> > http://mytecheye.blogspot.com/ <http://mytecheye.blogspot.com/>* >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Vanji >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Isuru Udana* >>> Senior Technical Lead >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com>email: [email protected] >>> <[email protected]> blog: http://mytecheye.blogspot.com/ >>> <http://mytecheye.blogspot.com/>* >>> >>> >>> >>> -- *Isuru Udana* Associate Director/Architect *; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com>email: [email protected] <[email protected]> *
