Thanks for the response Isuru. I will work on the improvement. On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 6:18 AM Isuru Udana <isud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Shafreen, > > On Wed, 2 Dec 2020, 22:00 Shafreen, <anfar.shafr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> At the moment when we deactivate the Message Forwarding Processor (MFP) >> what happens internally is that the scheduler keeps on executing the MFP >> according to the given interval. Inside the MFP we just have an if >> condition to check whether the MFP is deactivated. If so, it will >> immediately skip the execution of MFP. >> >> IMO, this redundant execution of MFP wastes CPU cycles. This could be >> especially problematic, when running in a constrained environment where the >> CPU cycles are limited. We can improve the implementation by deactivating >> the scheduler job itself and reactivating when needed. >> >> WDYT ? >> > +1. That should be the correct solution. > >> >> Thanks, >> Shafreen >> >
