[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13567724#comment-13567724
]
Hudson commented on SYNCOPE-298:
--------------------------------
Integrated in Syncope-trunk #47 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Syncope-trunk/47/])
Added comments to non re-runnable test and workaround for SYNCOPE-298
(Revision 1441004)
Result = SUCCESS
ashakirin :
Files :
*
/syncope/trunk/core/src/test/java/org/apache/syncope/core/rest/TaskTestITCase.java
*
/syncope/trunk/core/src/test/java/org/apache/syncope/core/rest/UserTestITCase.java
> Persistence beans: change AUTO Id generation strategy to TABLE
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SYNCOPE-298
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-298
> Project: Syncope
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Reporter: Andrei Shakirin
> Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>
> Currently AUTO Id generation strategy works unstable under high
> load/concurrency conditions at least for H2 DB. [1], [2]
> Possible solution of this problem is migration AUTO to TABLE Id generation
> strategy for all persistence domain objects.
> [1]
> http://syncope-dev.1063484.n5.nabble.com/Question-Problem-with-test-UsertTestITCase-issueSYNCOPE279-tt5712389.html
> [2]
> http://syncope-dev.1063484.n5.nabble.com/Persistence-id-generation-strategy-TABLE-vs-AUTO-td5711813.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
