Hi Francesco, This means that if commons-lang:2.6 is pulled in by some dependency (in > addition to being listed in syncope-common), we will be forced to use both > versions.
Ok I guess this is unavoidable. Let's just leave things as they are then I guess until Activiti upgrades. Colm. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <[email protected] > wrote: > On 18/02/2013 18:00, Francesco Chicchiriccň wrote: > >> On 18/02/2013 17:13, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We have two different dependencies of Commons Lang in 'core': >>> >>> commons-lang:commons-lang:jar:**2.6:compile >>> org.apache.commons:commons-**lang3:jar:3.1:compile >>> >>> 2.6 is coming in from syncope-common, 3.1 via Apache bval. Should we just >>> upgrade Syncope to use 3.1? >>> >> >> +1 >> >> Also consider that, as reported in commons-lang homepage, >> >> Note that Lang 3.0 (and subsequent versions) use a different package >>> (/org.apache.commons.lang3/) than the previous versions >>> (/org.apache.commons.lang/), allowing it to be used at the same time as an >>> earlier version. >>> >> >> This means that if commons-lang:2.6 is pulled in by some dependency (in >> addition to being listed in syncope-common), we will be forced to use both >> versions. >> > > > [INFO] +- org.activiti:activiti-engine:**jar:5.11:compile > [INFO] | +- org.apache.commons:commons-**email:jar:1.2:compile > [INFO] | +- commons-lang:commons-lang:jar:**2.4:compile > [INFO] | +- org.mybatis:mybatis:jar:3.1.1:**compile > [INFO] | \- joda-time:joda-time:jar:2.1:**compile > > Any idea? > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccň > > > ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member > http://people.apache.org/~**ilgrosso/<http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/> > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
