On 04/06/2014 13:09, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Am I correct in assuming that the REST API for 1.2 exposes the CXF-based REST service under "/rest", and that the old API previously available under "/rest" is removed?
Correct.
I think it would probably be a good idea to redirect "/cxf" queries to "/rest" so as not to break REST-based 1.1 clients, WDYT?
I don't see any problem with this redirect - I am actually wondering how to implement it - but AFAIR there are some differences between CXF 1.1 and 1.2 APIs.
Regards. -- Francesco Chicchiriccò Tirasa - Open Source Excellence http://www.tirasa.net/ Involved at The Apache Software Foundation: member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
