[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-1067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16049304#comment-16049304 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SYNCOPE-1067: ---------------------------------------------------------- Commit 03d5364b14bb911358f8b468924e304576ff99da in syncope's branch refs/heads/master from [~fmartelli] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=syncope.git;h=03d5364 ] [SYNCOPE-1067] provides the possibility to select for a dynamic realms and manage object inside it > More flexible delegated administration model > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: SYNCOPE-1067 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE-1067 > Project: Syncope > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: console, core > Reporter: Francesco Chicchiriccò > Assignee: Francesco Chicchiriccò > Fix For: 2.0.4, 2.1.0 > > > The current implementation of [delegated > administration|https://syncope.apache.org/docs/reference-guide.html#delegated-administration] > relies on Roles, where each Role associates a set of Entitlements (e.g. > administrative actions) to a set of Realms (e.g. containers for Users / > Groups / Any Objects). > This requires, however, that the set of Users / Groups / Any Objects to > administer is somehow statically defined by containment: "administrators with > role R can manage users under realms /a and /b" works as long as users to > administer are fully contained by the Realms /a and /b; but what if the set > of Users that R can administer needs to be dynamically defined, say by the > value of a 'department' attribute? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)