Thank you, Francesco. Excellent stuff and it's exciting to see this goodness come to life.
I would support the idea of doing an RC; for advanced users or those who might been following the activity on Github or other developers building against Syncope, this could prove useful. Of course, this is assuming the release-engineering effort is reasonable (and speaking of which, we could explore whether this bit may also be automated using Travis CI; we could let the robots do all the work before their eventual uprising and return of Arnold Schwarzenegger!) Happy Friday! --Misagh ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Francesco Chicchiriccò" <ilgro...@apache.org> > To: "dev" <dev@syncope.apache.org> > Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 3:33:05 PM > Subject: State of Syncope 3.0 > Hi all, > I thought I could spend a few words to describe the current status of our > efforts towards Syncope 3.0. > > Starting point is [1] where the overall code reorganization - now completed - > and the new components are introduced. > Also relevant is [2] which describes the identified issues in JIRA for the new > major version. > > Overall, this is the state by component: > > * Core is completed with several enhancements and improvements > > * Console was upgraded to latest components and technologies but is still > lacking the features to manage WA (Keymaster and SRA management was done, > instead) > > * Enduser was rewritten from scratch to uniform with Console as much as > possible > but needs work to finalize and possibly include new features derived from WA > as > auth profile management or SAML2 / OIDC account linking > > * SRA is completed > > * Keymaster is completed and provided in two flavors: self, e.g. REST and > internal storage based, and zookeeper, requiring an Apache Zookeeper > deployment > > * WA, based on Apereo CAS 6.4, is mostly completed but under continuous > refinement > > * Documentation is the sore point, essentially stuck at the same content as > 2.1 > > Similarly as we've done at the time of Syncope 2.0, I believe it is the case > to > publish some RCs before the official 3.0.0. > I don't think, however, we are yet a the point of issuing RC1, as we'd need at > least to: > > 1. update the Documentations at least with main changes > > 2. bring the Enduser application at a degree of usability > > 3. introduce at least some WA configuration items for Console > > WDYT? > Regards. > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SYNCOPE/%5BDISCUSS%5D+Syncope+3.0 > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SYNCOPE/versions/12322510 > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > Tirasa - Open Source Excellence > http://www.tirasa.net/ > > Member at The Apache Software Foundation > Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail > http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
