Hi Luciano, WRT docs, it would be nice to have a snapshot of the generated documentation site (like http://apache.github.io/incubator-systemml/). This allows a historical display of documentation similar to Spark ( http://spark.apache.org/documentation.html). If that is available online, is it necessary to package the Algorithms Reference PDF or README with the releases? Also, the docs/README.md describes generating the documentation site from markdown using jekyll so I'm not sure if that would help anyone if the *.md files aren't included in the release distributions. Or is this a different README?
Deron On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > great - thanks Niketan. From my perspective, we're also good to go. > > Regards, > Matthias > > [image: Inactive hide details for Niketan Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55 > AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this we]Niketan > Pansare---01/15/2016 11:56:55 AM---Hi all, As FYI, I ran some performance > experiments this week and the release > > From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Date: 01/15/2016 11:56 AM > Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release > ------------------------------ > > > > Hi all, > > As FYI, I ran some performance experiments this week and the release > SystemML 0.9 looks good to me :) > > Thanks, > > Niketan Pansare > IBM Almaden Research Center > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com > *http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar* > <http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar> > > Mike Dusenberry ---01/14/2016 06:49:31 PM---The DML Language Reference > would be great to have as well. Also, in general, I think we should only > > From: Mike Dusenberry <dusenberr...@gmail.com> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Date: 01/14/2016 06:49 PM > Subject: Re: Starting a SystemML 0.9 release > ------------------------------ > > > > The DML Language Reference would be great to have as well. > > Also, in general, I think we should only have the Javadocs for end-user > facing code, such MLContext, rather than for any deep internals that a user > is not going to interact with. > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > What should be the minimum documentation to add to the release > distribution > > ? > > > > Currently we have : > > docs/README.txt > > docs/SysteML_Algorithms_Reference.pdf > > > > I was planning to add the javadocs as well. > > > > But I still think we have much more available in trunk that we could > add... > > > > Suggestions are welcome... > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Also, for fixed jiras, I did the following query : > > > > > > > > > > > > *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27* > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-376?jql=project%20%3D%20SYSTEMML%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29%20AND%20created%20%3E%3D%202015-10-27> > > > > > > And was wondering if we could all move this to 0.9 release. > > > > > > Could someone please help me verify. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Luciano Resende < > luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> great - thanks everybody. Let's get these two fixes in and close the > > >>> release. Until that point, please no new features. The version number > > 0.9 > > >>> is fine with me since it's not really a pure maintenance release as > > many > > >>> new features went in too. Down the road, however, we need to think > > about > > >>> release branches. > > >>> > > >> We can create release branches now, or from the tag when we need a > 0.9.1 > > >> for example. As we are not a large project with tens of prs coming > very > > >> quick, I would recommend to create the branch as needed for minor > > releases. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Luciano Resende > > >> *http://people.apache.org/~lresende* > <http://people.apache.org/~lresende> > > >> *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975> > > >> *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Luciano Resende > > > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende* > <http://people.apache.org/~lresende> > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975> > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > *http://people.apache.org/~lresende* > <http://people.apache.org/~lresende> > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975> > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/> > > > -- > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > >
