This sounds good to me, and those of us at IBM agreed during a recent meeting
that we are okay with this approach if the community is. Deron noted that
there are a few licensing issues left over from last time, a few of which
relate to specific existing algorithms that may have been pulled from a
textbook. He sent out an email to the dev list a few days ago ("Fwd: [Vote]
Apache SystemML 0.9.0....."), but no responses yet.
Deron also opened several JIRAs with the remaining tasks. We don't want to
block any other work though with creating a release.
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On May 6, 2016, at 1:52 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I will be presenting SystemML next week at ApacheCon and would be great if
> we could have a release available or in progress.
>
> I know there was some initial discussion around a 0.9.1 release, but how
> about starting a 0.10.0 release out of trunk ?
>
> If nobody objects to it, I can volunteer to be the RM for the release.
>
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
