sure - go for it; but please include into the description that a fix should try to keep operations within one dag and only separate out prints if necessary.
Regards, Matthias From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 05/23/2016 02:09 PM Subject: Re: synchronized prints? We should create a JIRA issue to track fixing this "bug" within the engine. While the if-statement cut works as a quick hack, it would be much better to just ensure consistency natively. -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone. > On May 23, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <[email protected]> wrote: > > a simple workaround is to place an "if(1==1){}" cut between the prints to force their order. > > Regards, > Matthias > > Deron Eriksson ---05/23/2016 01:55:17 PM---Hi, Is there a way to make sure that print statements are synchronized while > > From: Deron Eriksson <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 05/23/2016 01:55 PM > Subject: synchronized prints? > > > > > Hi, > > Is there a way to make sure that print statements are synchronized while > developing a DML script? By this, I mean is there currently a way to ensure > that the order of print statements in a DML script are the order in which > they are displayed to standard output? > > Deron > >
