Thanks, they should all be on the staging site now. On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com> wrote:
> and maybe: > ? systemml-0.10.0-incubating.pom.md5 > > Also, the previous release had sha1 checksums. Do we need those too or is > that overkill? > > Deron > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I noticed that not all the artifacts at > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/ > > > have md5 checksums. > > > > > > Also, the previous release (see > > > > > > > > > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/systemml/systemml/0.9.0-incubating/ > > > ) > > > featured sha1 checksums but the current release candidate doesn't have > > sha1 > > > checksums. > > > > > > Deron > > > > > > > > > Are these the only ones missing ? > > > > ? systemml-0.10.0-incubating-inmemory.jar.md5 > > ? systemml-0.10.0-incubating-javadoc.jar.md5 > > ? systemml-0.10.0-incubating-sources.jar.md5 > > ? systemml-0.10.0-incubating-standalone.jar.md5 > > ? systemml-0.10.0-incubating.jar.md5 > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
