Question is mainly: is it explicit or key prefixes only. Last works for me to start. Le 28 déc. 2014 14:40, "Oliver B. Fischer" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hi Mark, > > category seems for me to be very similar to the concept of a namespace. Is > there anything we can do with catagories what we cannot do with namespaces? > > Best, > > Oliver > > Am 28.12.14 um 11:05 schrieb Mark Struberg: > >> If we manage configuration container wide for multiple applications and >> parts of those then we _might_ like to introduce 'categories'. >> >> >> In DeltaSpike we decided to not needing them because it is easy to just >> use namespacing and be done. But DeltaSpike config is mostly used inside an >> application and Tamaya should target container-wide configuration. >> >> >> So do we need those? >> >> We need to think through a few scenarios e.g. with multiple WARs >> configured on the same server. And also clustering. >> >> All the configuration along the classpath is 'local' to the current >> application anyway, but what about java env and properties, or a database >> configuration? >> Do we simply suggest using namespaces or do we like to introduce some >> application/category context? >> >> >> As always: adding this adds complexity and we really ONLY must do that if >> the advantages outpace the complexity. >> >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> > > -- > N Oliver B. Fischer > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > P +49 30 44793251 > M +49 178 7903538 > E [email protected] > S oliver.b.fischer > J [email protected] > X http://xing.to/obf > >
