I think to me the question is more what is the benefit of Junit over TestNG? I've been creating annotation/configuration driven tests for a very long time now with TestNG. Junit4 is going to have to do a lot better than copying one (and not even a full copy!) feature to win me over.
They also aren't supported in maven2 as far as I know...Plus I kind of like the testng engineers now :) Who knows, maybe the agility(snicker) of the junit engineers will surprise us all in the next few months but I doubt it.. On 6/23/06, Kalle Korhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/17/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As long as we're on the subject, I should warn everyone that I also > plan/would like to change our unit tests to use TestNG as well. It's the Just asking - regarding Tap, what's the benefit of TestNG over Junit 4.x? Kalle --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Jesse Kuhnert Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.
