I really don't understand what's all the fuzz about this. If you want a backwards compatible Tapestry version, take 4.1 and make 4.2, 4.3, etc! OTH, I think rewriting to Tapestry 5, if it's as good as it sounds, is actually cheaper than maintaining legacy apps. Software evolves!

So +1 to Howard's effort. And after all, I think he's the only one investing resources on that version yet (resources that would be wasted working in 4.1 since Jesse is already doing a great job). So the community has nothing to lose and a lot to win.

--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
Web Application Design and Programming
http://www.dtqsoftware.com


Mind Bridge escribió:
I would also suggest moving to a proven programming language like C! Let's move forward!

Francis Amanfo wrote:
I am +1 on dumping HiveMind into the trash bin and NOT reinvent the wheel
but use the popular, innovative and proven Spring IoC framework.
I'm also +1 on giving Tapestry 5 a whole new name like "Wicked".

F

On 7/27/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

There's been a lot of buzz on my Blog about the (very, very) early
Tapestry 5 code base:

http://howardlewisship.com/blog/2006/07/tapestry-5-updates.html#comments

I've asked that people do more of the discussions here, where its most
visible to the Tapestry community.

--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
TWD Consulting, Inc.
Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant
Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry
Creator, Apache HiveMind

Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support
and project work.  http://howardlewisship.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to