[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-994?page=comments#action_12424529 ] Andreas Andreou commented on TAPESTRY-994: ------------------------------------------
The type parameter of Component annotation is in fact necessary in some cases, i.e. when the component name is different that the component classname (@If and class IfBean) or when the component is part of a library (and thus needs a prefix) However, i too believe that if type is left blank the framework should try to fill in the details... > component types unnecessary for annotations > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: TAPESTRY-994 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-994 > Project: Tapestry > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Annotations > Affects Versions: 4.0.2 > Reporter: Brian Ross > Assigned To: Andreas Andreou > Priority: Minor > > Why do I have to type @Component(type = "TextField") when the return type of > the abstract method below it is TextField? Can't this be inferred? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
