Sounds fine to me. I think Tapestry 5 is already on the right track:
<name>Tapestry Core Library</name> On 11/7/06, andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone minds making the (project) names in all pom.xml a bit more descriptive? i.e. 'Tapestry Core Library' instead of 'Core Library' Mevenide uses that value to name the projects within the IDE... And anyway, i don't mind adding tapestry everywhere. -- Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://andyhot.di.uoa.gr Tapestry / Tacos developer Open Source / J2EE Consulting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Howard M. Lewis Ship TWD Consulting, Inc. Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry Creator, Apache HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com
