Interesting idea with the caveat that it can not be fully validated at compile time (all of the extra attributes will need to have default values ... oh and for primtives, its very hard to distinguish a default value for a provided value).
On 12/19/06, Ron Piterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Continueing the @Bindings annotation discussion above, it just accured to me: a real profit of a @Binding annotation could be something like: @Binding(name="name",number=5) or @Binding(name="name",bool=true) or @Binding(name="name",type=Object.class) or @Binding(name="name",string="some string") or finally, @Binding(name="name",expression="listener:somelistener") where only expression is evaluated as bindings values are evaluate nowadays. Cheers, Ron --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Howard M. Lewis Ship TWD Consulting, Inc. Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant Creator and PMC Chair, Apache Tapestry Creator, Apache HiveMind Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support and project work. http://howardlewisship.com
