I'd prefer .xhtml, although if both .html and .xhtml could be used, I don't see that being terrible. It wouldn't really be configurable -- Tapestry would just add both to its search path.
That way, those needing .html for their tools would be all set, and those wanting .xhtml for validation (e.g., in IntelliJ IDEA) would also be all set. -- Kevin On 9/18/07 10:53 AM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Massimo Lusetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/18/07, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That's why I'm leaning towards a Tapestry-centric extension, ".tml" perhaps. >> >> I kind of see the extension/editor issue as a straw man. > > Maybe but i would not make the error of not taking in consideration > the power of the gui-guys they often talk a language more similar to > the boss's one and it's not that easy to balance. > > I would prefer html or xhtml... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
