That could be a problem indeed, especially given the 3 vote minimum. More details at: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
In reading that, you may find that it gets a little murky with regards to PMC votes for non-code modifications. But, at that point, I guess you would have to have a solid definition of who gets binding and who doesn't. At that point, it's probably easiest/best to just add the responsible parties to the project's PMC. -- Kevin On 10/23/07 1:17 PM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Howard Lewis Ship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll look into this next week ... right now I think Jesse and I are the only > active PMC members (though I'll have to check). Many of the others: > Mindbridge, Geoff Longman, etc., have "wandered off". > > On 10/23/07, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I'm quite certain he needs to be on the PMC for his vote to be >> binding. We >> ran into this ourselves over at the Cayenne project. >> >> -- >> Kevin >> >> >> On 10/22/07 11:01 PM, in article >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Howard Lewis >> Ship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> And that really is the question: on this vote is committer status enough >> for >>> a binding vote, or do we need to get you onto the PMC? >>> >>> On 10/22/07, Dan Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
