What about abstract "base" pages?
Robert
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11/261:26 PM , Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA) wrote:
Tapestry should enforce that component classes only extend from
other (transformed) component classes, or java.lang.Object
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: TAPESTRY-1934
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1934
Project: Tapestry
Issue Type: Bug
Components: tapestry-core
Affects Versions: 5.0.6
Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship
Currently, you can have a component extend from any base class.
That causes issues when there's a class (that, perhaps, has state)
between java.lang.Object and a component class (i.e., a class in a
managed component class package). Tapestry should explicitly forbid
this.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
