On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Kevin Menard <nirvd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on this. For everything they've gotten wrong, I think in this > regard Microsoft got naming of interfaces correct. There's no > ambiguity about the evolution of a given interface. Well, i can adapt quite well to interfaces naming, but these all reminds me of some wired symbols version at C time... and believe me, it's nice! -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
