Em Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:25:35 -0300, Marcelo Lotif <[email protected]>
escreveu:
and when I met tapestry-hibernate, I thought it was even easier that JPA,
and as a plus has some features that just hibernate has, like criteria
Criteria queries rules!
Maybe is just a lack of knowledge, but I don't see any advantages of a
tapestry-jpa module over the existent tapestry-hibernate, except the fact
that toplink is lighter (and maybe faster) than hibernate. Can someone
point me some?
I guess the point is to support JPA for the people who wants pure,
non-Hibernate, JSR-starndard EntityManager-based ORM. And which one is
better is not something that everyone will agree. I'm on the Hibernate
side, though. :)
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
