Robert Zeigler wrote:
I think you'll catch some flak for pushing portlet support off to 5.2,
since you've inferred elsewhere that 5.1 was when that would happen.
See, eg:
http://fanf42.blogspot.com/2008/10/metting-tapestry-father-howard-lewis.html
http://java.dzone.com/articles/tapestry-50-refcard-meet-the-a (ok,
here you punt and say 5.1 or 5.2)
http://markmail.org/message/5v27xsqrdgrr2a2h (here it's: 5.1?)
and, most damning:
http://tapestry.formos.com/nightly/tapestry5/ where, under "Roadmap"
we say:
"High priorities for 5.1 include Spring Web Flow integration, and
support for developing Tapestry applications as Portlets."
But the 5.1 release is much closer from 5.0 than first expected, so why
not ? I will amend my blog if you want ;)
--
Francois Armand
Etudes & Développements J2EE
Groupe Linagora - http://www.linagora.com
Tél.: +33 (0)1 58 18 68 28
-----------
http://fanf42.blogspot.com
InterLDAP - http://interldap.org
FederID - http://www.federid.org/
Open Source identities management and federation
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
