Tapestry is so fun to use and develop, imho documentation should be as well. I understand and agree with christian arguments, so i guess we should vote for confluence for all the good reasons explained, but this should not exclude to work on a fun and appealing front page.

Regards
Christophe Cordenier

Envoyé de mon iPhone

Le 4 mai 2010 à 23:06, "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo" <[email protected] m> a écrit :

On Tue, 04 May 2010 17:26:27 -0300, Christian Riedel <[email protected] > wrote:

I'd use confluence because:
- documentation can be added on-the-fly

This is very important, IMHO.

- fixes to older documentation is not dependent on the release of the framework
- the infrastructure is already there
- more contributers could be allowed access to add documentation

This is very important, IMHO, even having a separate part for official documentation. If someone writes a nice wiki page, we could easily make it part of the official documentation.

- comments by users on documentation pages could help you to find errors fast and others to get an alternative solution

I wasn't thinking of it and that's a very nice feature. Thanks Christian!

...and jira's documentation is quite ok imho:
http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/ALLDOC/JIRA+Documentation+Directory

negative point is that everybody has to learn that confluence syntax and nobody likes writing documentation anyway...

And also converting the current documentation. This would be a problem for any solution besides keep on using the same tools we already use (Maven).

+1 to Confluence.

--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to