Adding new modules to Apache SVN we need to have at least one committer responsible for this module. Will you have time in the future to maintain it? If so, I have no concerns.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Robert Zeigler < [email protected]> wrote: > The thread on tapestry modules got me thinking a bit... > > Awhile back, Kevin Menard and I started an integration library between > tapestry and cayenne (http://cayenne.apache.org). I know Kevin was hoping > this would eventually move to be an "official" tapestry module (rather than > 3rd party), but I've been reluctant. What are your thoughts? We have an > "official" hibernate integration module; should we have an "official" > cayenne one? If so, I can move the code into a new tapestry sub-module. I > use the integration in several of my own projects and keep it compatible > with the current version of tapestry; I would take responsibility for > continuing to maintain the module under the tapestry umbrella. This isn't > meant to be an official vote, and I'm not set on moving it into tapestry. > I'm just trying to gauge how much interest there would be in having a better > supported cayenne integration module. > > Robert > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Best regards, Igor Drobiazko http://tapestry5.de
