On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 06:13:29 -0300, Robin Komiwes <robin.komi...@gmail.com> wrote:

Well, I must admit that Andreas is making a point. LABjs is lighter and do one single job: loading CSS/JS.

Agreed.

In a more global way, I would love to see tapestry.js doing less and
depending more on external solutions.

Less code for committers to maintain, so they can focus on Tapestry itself. :)

--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to