Two things: if it isn't fixed, it shouldn't have a fix release.  If it
has a fix release, it may show up in the release notes incorrectly.

Second, I was picturing this purge as being more about invalid or
non-reproducible bugs.  This improvement request, for example, is
valid (just very low priority).


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Massimo Lusetti (JIRA) <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:20 PM
Subject: [jira] [Closed] (TAP5-199) Tapestry writes localization
initialization information for DateField even when in locale "en"
To: [email protected]



    [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Massimo Lusetti closed TAP5-199.
--------------------------------

      Resolution: Won't Fix
   Fix Version/s: 5.3


Please open a new one for 5.3 if this still applicable

> Tapestry writes localization initialization information for DateField even 
> when in locale "en"
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-199
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-199
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.15
>            Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 5.3
>
>
> This is an optimization; the client-side DatePicker starts configured for 
> locale "en" and only needs localization initialization for other locales.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira





-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship

Creator of Apache Tapestry

The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!

(971) 678-5210
http://howardlewisship.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to