If we go beta now, is that a feature freeze on trunk and the creation of a 5.4 
branch for new features? That's what I would advocate, but...

Robert

On Aug 16, 2011, at 8/165:55 PM , Howard Lewis Ship wrote:

> Just seeing if there are any objections to starting a lazy-consensus
> stability vote to go to "beta".
> 
> This is largely symbolic; it indicates that the focus should shift
> from adding new features, to fixing bugs and stabilizing features,
> with the goal of create a release candidate and then a final release.
> 
> I could keep adding things forever, but it would be nice to have a 5.3
> release within a year of the 5.2 release.  In any case, we can create
> a branch to start work on Tapestry 5.4 as well.
> 
> See http://tapestry.apache.org/version-numbers.html
> 
> -- 
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> 
> Creator of Apache Tapestry
> 
> The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
> learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
> 
> (971) 678-5210
> http://howardlewisship.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to