On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Ulrich Stärk <u...@spielviel.de> wrote: > Just to make sure: we don't plan to actually release the release candidate to > a wider audience, i.e. > outside the staging/snapshot repository, right? If this was going to be an > actual release, we'd have > to do a formal vote.
We're in agreement ... It will be the same process as the betas, just "rc-1" instead of "beta-237". > > Uli > > On 28.10.2011 00:29, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: >> I think I'm ready for a release candidate. The only thing that's >> pending for me is the very, very elusive byte-code issue that only >> ProQuest seems to have stumbled upon. Other than that, the benefits >> of getting an RC out there now outweighs the benefits of fixing yet >> more bugs. >> >> I do think there will likely be a 5.3.1 containing some backfixes for >> things that will be addressed in 5.4, including (I hope) sorting out >> some of the Generics problems. >> >> In any case, unless I hear otherwise, I expect to create an rc . >> >> This is a lazy consensus vote; please respond by Monday. If I don't >> see a viable -1 vote, I'll create the release candidate then. >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
