If you don't want "two ways" there is no need for the @Startup in the first place, your argument doesn't make much sense to me, I'm sorry. I thought that Tapestry motto is "code less", so if there is a second way with less code, why it's a bad thing?
Steve suggested on the mailing list the same improvement, why it doesn't count? Denis Mar 8, 2012 v 2:28 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo: > On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:44:50 -0300, Denis Stepanov <denis.stepa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I can change it to use the @Order, but I'm not sure Tapestry devs are >> interested or even care to have it. > > Your wording makes it seem the Tapestry committers are ignoring user > suggestions or patches. That isn't the case. Can't they disagree with user > suggestions and patches? Actually, two of them already said they don't agree > with your suggestion to avoid having two ways of doing the same thing, as the > current one is good enough. > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and > instructor > Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. > http://www.arsmachina.com.br --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
