Ulrich Stärk: +0 (binding) As I said earlier, I don't see the benefit in upgrading to 'just' 1.6 right now, even if it means we could use newer versions of our dependencies. If you want to do it anyway I won't stand in your way.
Cheers, Uli On 2014-05-15 15:14, Jochen Kemnade wrote: > There have been discussions whether we want to keep compatibility with Java 5 > for the upcoming 5.4 > release. > Java 5 is EOSL since October 2009. > While requiring Java 6 would not bring us much benefits, there might be some > libraries that we > cannot use because they do not support Java 5. Also, we'd spare ourselves > some efforts not having to > support Java 5 anymore. > The vote will run for 3 days and, if it succeeds, I will increase the minimum > required Java version > to 1.6. > > Jochen Kemnade: +1 (non-binding) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
