Can other PMC members please weigh in here. Jochen, no reason to close the vote till you have a binding majority decision either way.
Kalle On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Kristian Marinkovic < [email protected]> wrote: > Kristian Mairnkovic: +1 (non-binding) > > i don't see any reason not to raise the minimun requirement to 1.6. i've to > admit most of my Tapestry apps run on Java 1.6. anyways. > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Bob Harner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Bob Harner: +1 (non-binding) > > On May 18, 2014 1:05 PM, "Jochen Kemnade" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > There have been discussions whether we want to keep compatibility with > > > Java 5 for the upcoming 5.4 release. > > > Java 5 is EOSL since October 2009. > > > While requiring Java 6 would not bring us much benefits, there might be > > > some libraries that we cannot use because they do not support Java 5. > > > Also, we'd spare ourselves some efforts not having to support Java 5 > > > anymore. > > > The vote will run for 3 days and, if it succeeds, I will increase the > > > minimum required Java version to 1.6. > > > > > > Jochen Kemnade: +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > >
