On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Jochen Kemnade <jochen.kemn...@eddyson.de>
wrote:
> Am 08.08.2014 10:36, schrieb Jochen Kemnade:
>
>> The loading mask looks fine, although you seem to have omitted all the
>> non-proprietary/-prefixed CSS3 directives. Any specific reason for that?
>>
>
> I just tried adding them, but that doesn't improve things. The problem is
> that the mask is shown with background-color:#000 until the fade-in
> animation kicks in.
> We could add opacity:0; to .pageloading-mask, but that would cause issues
> with IE<10:
> IE9 would not show the mask at all, because it understands opacity but no
> CSS animations. IE8 and below would just show a black mask.
> Although I wouldn't exactly like it, we could add a conditional stylesheet
> with .pageloading-mask { opacity: 0.5} for IE9 and accept that it's ugly on
> IE8 (perfectly fine if you ask me).
> What do you think?
>
I don't like it either but IE8 is the most used browser out there at the
moment.
Maybe there should be a more fine-grained switch off/on of the feature -
per client capabilities ?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
