Another one small fix
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 1:51 AM Dimitris Zenios <dimitris.zen...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Sure but lets get 5.5 out the door first.
>
> I have been going over the changes and i have some patches available.
>
> First attached is the already mentioned issue with static interface methods
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 1:26 AM Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
> thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:36 PM Dimitris Zenios <
>> dimitris.zen...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I have some ideas on that subject but lest get 5.5 out first and
>> continue
>> > on that afterwards
>> >
>>
>> Nice! Could you please start a new thread with your ideas? I'm curious
>> about them. :)
>>
>>
>> >
>> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:33 PM Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
>> > thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Yeah, it would break webapps styled with Bootstrap 4 due to the
>> different
>> > > tagging. Maybe we (the Tapestry team or the community) could come up
>> > with a
>> > > separate library to do this.
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:30 PM Dimitris Zenios <
>> > dimitris.zen...@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Its not so huge my main concern is the backwards compatibility
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 PM Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
>> > > > thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 6:45 PM Dimitris Zenios <
>> > > > dimitris.zen...@gmail.com
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Even though it might be irrelevant i was also thinking of
>> bootstrap
>> > > 4.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hmm, it would be nice, but I don't think it would be a trivial,
>> quick
>> > > > thing
>> > > > > to do. Any takers? :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:31 PM Dimitris Zenios <
>> > > > > > dimitris.zen...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > +1
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, 22:28 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
>> > > > > > > thi...@arsmachina.com.br wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> Hello!
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> Since we now have a working build and ASM 7 supporting Java
>> 11,
>> > I
>> > > > was
>> > > > > > >> thinking of release a beta version so people could test it on
>> > > their
>> > > > > > >> own projects. What do you think?
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> Cheers!
>> > > > > > >> --
>> > > > > > >> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>> > > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Thiago
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Thiago
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thiago
>>
>
From b601d7a27879f76e217a0117831fce2bf973721a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dimitris Zenios <dimitris.zen...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2018 01:55:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Misplaced semicolon resulted in the test to not run
---
.../src/test/groovy/ioc/specs/PropertyAccessImplSpec.groovy | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tapestry-ioc/src/test/groovy/ioc/specs/PropertyAccessImplSpec.groovy b/tapestry-ioc/src/test/groovy/ioc/specs/PropertyAccessImplSpec.groovy
index 8ea3ee97e..3c6380645 100644
--- a/tapestry-ioc/src/test/groovy/ioc/specs/PropertyAccessImplSpec.groovy
+++ b/tapestry-ioc/src/test/groovy/ioc/specs/PropertyAccessImplSpec.groovy
@@ -816,7 +816,6 @@ class PropertyAccessImplSpec extends Specification {
}
public enum ById implements IdentifiableEnum<ById, Byte> {
- ;
public Byte getId() {
return null
}
--
2.19.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
