Hi there! We are definitely going to finish 5.10 ;-)
The next point on the agenda is an RC, as there are a lot of changes, and we don’t want to have to push 5.10.1 directly after. What exactly didn’t you get running? Did you use a snapshot, or build it yourself? If there’s no time pressure, maybe waiting for the RC might be the best approach. The more people test their special cases with it, the more issues can be fixed before releasing the final 5.10. Cheers Ben On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 8:30 PM Numa Schmeder via dev < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > This is a great idea! I wanted to work on this use case as I use quite > extensively Tapestry in some projects and Nextjs on other projects. > But for heavy backend use I really prefer Tapestry. It avoids streaming > tones of javascript to the frontend. I would really like to tightly > integrate both and get rid of jQuery. Call Tapestry page action listeners > directly from React using helpers, build dynamic forms and components with > react, and synchronise them with Tapestry etc. > > Great work! > > Regards, > > Numa > > > > Le 13 janv. 2026 à 09:26, [email protected] a écrit : > > > > Hi guys, > > > > there are some scenarios in which Tapestry can be very useful as backend > for frontend for React apps, instead of Javascript BfFs as suggested by > React, e.g. nextjs. > > There are many reasons to prefer a java BfF, the main one is reducing of > size and complexity of large React SPAs - it is much easier to do while > using a Java BfF (not necessarily Tapestry) then nextjs. > > > > The idea is to build an ESM module from a React node project and use it > in Tapestry as a resource. > > > > You can find here: > > > > https://www.webclient.at/SourceCode#Demo_Application_Sources > > > > how it works with tapestry versions up to 5.9.0 and React 19.1 > > > > As the future Tapestry version 5.10. enables ESM modules directly, I'v > tried to build the same demo with Tapestry head, but I am not able to get > it running. Does it make sense to keep trying? Will the version 5.10 be > finished? > > > > > > You can find here more about the motivation behind this endeavour: > > > > https://www.webclient.at/WebClientExperience#Java_BfF_for_React_Micro > > > > here a simple demo app: > > > > https://www.webclient.at/DemoApp > > > > As long as you are using React version lower than 19, it is possible to > use React UMD modules, in this case you would not necessarily need to > create an ESM module for the React app. > > > > With regards, Peter Skala > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
