Extending beyond 72 hours is fine. I suggest giving a specific extension period. Or better, get one more vote.
Marlon On 7/31/15, 10:11 AM, "Ian Dunlop" <ian.dun...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA256 > >Hello, > >The [VOTE] email says that the vote is open for at least 72 hours so I >think we can keep it open for as long as we want. Or at least until it >makes sense to start again. > >(The first time I read our VOTE pro-forma I thought it was a max of 72 >hours! Is there an apache standard for how long a vote can be open?) > >Cheers, > >Ian > >On 31/07/2015 13:51, Pierce, Marlon wrote: >> 24 hours to go and no votes, and no responses to my minor >> questions? Not a good sign. The release looks good to me, and Ian >> has done a lot of work to get things in the standard Apache release >> format. >> >> Marlon >> >> >> On 7/29/15, 9:59 AM, "Ian Dunlop" <ian.dun...@manchester.ac.uk> >> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Please use this thread to discuss any issues or queries related to >> >> Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC4 Apache Taverna Language >> 0.15.0-incubating-RC4 >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ian >> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v2 > >iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVu4H7AAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5jaIIAJ6xZ+WC+NL1EG+3GL2g2wa9 >S9dCQVgweXirt7VcU1x0n8hz+rGOGm/edHk0lmZUfY0MWYCMvSFljVrpiSsC3OFr >03vw61RHHNNF/4wTXMAP361d75u5BLQ/4kI6Qyi3gGdigHHmEnZs/LSEhBksFCsw >rsVzYncwt5MUFg63umCGntOzZEBZQxQFZ3xLk8IxOQ1OjUGIyUdTJ+F7/7iZT+OO >coXDslrydxhVzcw0z5fSq+xI4uKVt4mhoFGfG4BmIwe/hOz2+hyqD1FclMiis/n+ >zM1MIL0uKLn+uSofy3lBYTiLh2q1hhoIyDB6sEfrHqiK2EtMxPe+Qi1yg5nxN0I= >=6K1c >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
