Uh. .. well https://github.com/ribot/android-boilerplate/blob/master/LICENSE
Says Apache license 2.0, and there is no NOTICE file or copyright statement in their individual files (spot check of 5, you can check the ones you used), so it should be fine to use without any special attribution. You can out an attribution to our README.md perhaps, but not as a legally required attribution in NOTICE. See http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0#redistribution 4a) is satisfied as we include LICENSE 4b) is satisfied because by our added ASF headers. 4c) is satisfied if the files we used don't have any copyright headers etc 4d) is satisfied as there was no NOTICE On 7 Jun 2016 7:17 a.m., "Sagar" <[email protected]> wrote: > @stain <https://github.com/stain> I have added the licence in all new > files java and xml files. > > I have taken some standard class from Ribot Android Boilerplate > <https://github.com/ribot/android-boilerplate> . > *Which licence have I to use in this case?* > > Other files that doest have the licence. I will add licence into the file > simultaneously when I will refactor the code in MVP architecture. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-mobile/pull/14#issuecomment-224189851>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAPd5clr1gr1USdvB9qFj2IdBAxq40dDks5qJQz0gaJpZM4Irgc6> > . >
