DemesneGH commented on issue #165:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-trustzone-sdk/issues/165#issuecomment-2635948721

   > * Option 3: Release as v0.4.0, indicating as a major development step. As 
we see further adoption of Rust based TAs in production environments then only 
we will be able to know their stability.
   
   I agree with you. Let's make the next release 0.4.0. However, since 
0.3.0-rc1 did not complete the Apache release process, we may have to keep it 
as rc1 for now.
   
   
   > We can do releases in say 1 week cadence with OP-TEE releases with a minor 
version bump say for example `v0.4.0` => `v0.4.1` for the next OP-TEE `v4.6.0` 
release and so on.
   
   The version format follows `MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH`, it's good to sync with 
OP-TEE's release plan but I'm not sure whether to increment the MINOR or PATCH 
number. Would the MINOR number be more reasonable? (which means `v0.5.0 for 
OP-TEE v4.6.0`)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@teaclave.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@teaclave.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@teaclave.apache.org

Reply via email to