Dear Community,

This vote is now closed.
The proposal has passed with 4 binding +1 votes.

We will proceed with the outlined action items to align our repositories
with the refined project direction and get ready for graduation.

Best,
Zhaofeng

On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 12:12 PM Mingshen Sun <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 approved.
>
> This is a great plan! Thanks.
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 9:04 PM He Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 approve
> >
> > On 2025/07/14 03:27:11 Zhaofeng Chen wrote:
> > > Dear community,
> > >
> > > We are initiating a vote on the proposed **Teaclave repository
> > > reorganization plan** to better align with the project's current
> > direction
> > > and usage. The vote will be open for **at least 3 days**. Everyone is
> > > welcome to share your thoughts and **cast your vote by replying to this
> > > thread explicitly**:
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > > After passing the community votes, we will proceed with the action
> items
> > to
> > > move forward for graduation.
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > ## Background
> > >
> > > Teaclave was originally created with a broad vision to explore the
> > > possibilities of confidential computing. It consisted of multiple
> > > components, including SDKs supporting Intel SGX and Arm TrustZone, a
> > > general-purpose application framework (FaaS), and experimental
> > verification
> > > efforts, spanning several repositories under the Apache Incubator.
> > >
> > > Over the years, as the field of confidential computing evolved, we
> > observed
> > > a clear trend: developers increasingly preferred building their own
> > Trusted
> > > Applications using SDKs directly, rather than relying on a
> > general-purpose
> > > FaaS framework. This organic shift in usage has also been reflected in
> > our
> > > contributor activities. Most community engagement and active
> development
> > > now center around the SDKs, especially the Rust-based TrustZone and SGX
> > > SDKs.
> > >
> > > As part of our preparation for graduation from the Apache Incubator,
> > we’ve
> > > received recurring questions about what Teaclave is today, and what its
> > > long-term focus should be. To address this and align with current usage
> > and
> > > contributions, we propose a refined mission and corresponding
> repository
> > > restructuring.
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > ## Refined Mission
> > >
> > > `Teaclave empowers developers to build memory-safe (e.g. Rust) Trusted
> > > Applications across diverse confidential computing platforms.`
> > > Our primary focus going forward will be on maintaining and improving
> SDKs
> > > that support this mission.
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > ## Repository Restructuring Plan
> > >
> > > ### Goals
> > >
> > > - Reflect Teaclave’s active development and current focus
> > > - Reduce long-term maintenance costs for inactive components
> > > - Preserve historical contributions and community merit
> > >
> > > ### `incubator-teaclave`
> > >
> > > **Current Status:**
> > > - Role: Former flagship repository for the FaaS-style confidential
> > > computing framework.
> > > - Activity: Last commit in July 2023.
> > > - Maintenance: No longer actively developed or aligned with the
> > community’s
> > > current direction.
> > >
> > > **Shift in Focus:**
> > > - This repository will be repurposed as the **main landing page** for
> the
> > > Teaclave project (Podling or TLP). It will provide high-level
> > > documentation, links to active SDKs, examples to help users get
> started,
> > > and showcases to build with Teaclave SDKs.
> > > - Historical contributions and community merit will be preserved [1].
> > > - Preview of reorganized content is already hosted on the `main` branch
> > [2].
> > >   - A clear project overview
> > >   - Links to active SDK repositories (TrustZone, SGX, etc.)
> > >   - Showcases for each SDK
> > >   - A unified contribution guide and roadmap
> > >
> > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave/graphs/contributors
> > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave/tree/main
> > >
> > > **Action Items:**
> > > - Deprecate the existing `master` branch and rename it to `legacy`
> > > - Set `main` as the default branch
> > >
> > > ### `incubator-teaclave-crates`
> > >
> > > **Current Status:**
> > > - Role: Hosts ported/forked crates for TEE platforms (e.g., sgx-crypto,
> > > protobuf)
> > > - Activity: Some crates are outdated or redundant
> > > - Maintenance: Partial
> > >
> > > **Shift in Focus:**
> > > This repository will remain an **auxiliary dependency hub** supporting
> > only
> > > the active SDKs. It will be **cleaned and scoped down** to what is
> still
> > > necessary for TrustZone/SGX development.
> > > **Action Items:**
> > > - Retain the repository to support SDK builds and examples
> > > - Remove:
> > >   - Crates no longer used by maintained SDKs or demos
> > >   - Redundant forks of crates that now work upstream
> > > - Preserve and maintain:
> > >   - Crates required by `incubator-teaclave-trustzone-sdk` or
> > > `incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk`
> > >
> > > ### `incubator-teaclave-verification`
> > >
> > > **Current Status:**
> > > - Role: Experimental repo for formal verification methods
> > > - Activity: No active development or adoption
> > > - Maintenance: Unmaintained
> > >
> > > **Shift in Focus:**
> > > This repository will become a **historical archive** for early
> > verification
> > > efforts, preserved for transparency and reference.
> > >
> > > **Action Items:**
> > > - Archive the repository on GitHub (read-only)
> > > - Add a short README noting its archival status and rationale
> > >
> > > ### Active SDKs
> > >
> > > These SDKs are actively maintained and form the core of Teaclave’s
> > current
> > > focus:
> > > - `incubator-teaclave-trustzone-sdk`
> > > - `incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk`
> > > - `incubator-teaclave-java-tee-sdk`
> > >
> > > No changes are proposed at this time. Any future updates will be
> > discussed
> > > in separate threads.
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to