[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15718838#comment-15718838
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TEPHRA-199:
---------------------------------------

Github user poornachandra commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-tephra/pull/20
  
    Thanks for the review @anew. I've addressed the comments, please take 
another look.
    
    > Regarding correctness, my major concern is that the (min(max invalid), 
min(inProgress)-1) is not a safe bound for transaction that are guaranteed not 
to write any more.
    I have filed TEPHRA-199 to address this, I'll make the changes in the next 
PR.
    
    Do you have a suggestion for a better name for `pruneUpperBoundTime`? 
Basically this is an upper bound for transactions that are not active (i.e, can 
be still used for writing). 


> Enforce maximum duration a transaction can be used for data writes
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEPHRA-199
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-199
>             Project: Tephra
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Poorna Chandra
>            Assignee: Poorna Chandra
>             Fix For: 0.10.0-incubating
>
>
> Based on a comment from [~anew] in a PR [ 1 ] -
> Question: Suppose I start a transaction, which times out, and therefore goes 
> into the invalid list. A little later HBase performs a major compaction. This 
> transaction and all its writes are removed from the table by the DataJanitor. 
> A little later TxManager prunes its invalid transactions, and because this tx 
> has been removed from HBase, it removes it from the invalid list.
> The problem is if the program that started the transaction is still running. 
> What if it performs another write after the transaction pruning? This would 
> be an invalid version, but now it has been pruned from the invalid list and 
> becomes visible.
> [ 1 ] - 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tephra/pull/19#issuecomment-258645956



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to