dev  

Messages by Thread

• [D] CI for workflow-to-Python verification: pooled Python workers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] CI for workflow-to-Python verification: pooled Python workers [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] CI for workflow-to-Python verification: pooled Python workers [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Adopt a UCI-sponsored self-hosted GitHub Actions runner [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Loop Start requires exactly one materialized reader on its input port, is lifting this planned? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Loop Start requires exactly one materialized reader on its input port, is lifting this planned? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Loop Start requires exactly one materialized reader on its input port, is lifting this planned? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Loop Start requires exactly one materialized reader on its input port, is lifting this planned? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Loop Start requires exactly one materialized reader on its input port, is lifting this planned? [texera] via GitHub
• [D] What should "Import Workflow" do? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] What should "Import Workflow" do? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] What should "Import Workflow" do? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] What should "Import Workflow" do? [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automated operator-demo video generator [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Usability (Authentication): Ideal methods to sign in? [texera] via GitHub
• [D] UX confusion: Search bar [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX confusion: Search bar [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX confusion: Search bar [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX confusion: Search bar [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Design input: should a Python UDF mount multiple datasets, or just one? [texera] via GitHub
• [D] UX Feedback (Operator Descriptions) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback (Operator Descriptions) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback (Operator Descriptions) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback (Operator Descriptions) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback (Operator Descriptions) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback (Operator Descriptions) [texera] via GitHub
• Accepted: Monthly Texera Incubation Sync Meeting on July 28, Tuesday, 3:00 - 4:00 PM PDT yiconghuang
  • Accepted: Monthly Texera Incubation Sync Meeting on July 28, Tuesday, 3:00 - 4:00 PM PDT yiconghuang
• [D] Unifying Project-Specific Code in a Single Repository [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Unifying Project-Specific Code in a Single Repository [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Unifying Project-Specific Code in a Single Repository [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Unifying Project-Specific Code in a Single Repository [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support external and domain-specific code integrations [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support external and domain-specific code integrations [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support external and domain-specific code integrations [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support external and domain-specific code integrations [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Unify Project Landing/About Pages via Block Composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Unify Project Landing/About Pages via Block Composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Unify Project Landing/About Pages via Block Composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support Customizable Landing/About Pages via Block Composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Support customizable landing/about pages via block composition [texera] via GitHub
• [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] UX Feedback: Trash Icon Behavior When Removing Packages from an Environment [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrate Login Page out of about. [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal - Migrating User Authentication to a new table to support multiple log-in sources. [texera] via GitHub
• [D] py2wf: a compiler from plain Python scripts to operator DAG workflows (.py → .pyt → workflow) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] py2wf: a compiler from plain Python scripts to operator DAG workflows (.py → .pyt → workflow) [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] py2wf: a compiler from plain Python scripts to operator DAG workflows (.py → .pyt → workflow) [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Change about page description for Texera [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Change about page description for Texera [texera] via GitHub
• [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Xuan Gu
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Ian Maxon
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Xuan Gu
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Ian Maxon
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Xuan Gu
• [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Xuan Gu
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Ryan Zhang
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Meng Wang
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Matthew Ball
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Carlos Ernesto Alvarez Berumen
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Ali Risheh
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Eugene Gu
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Kary Zheng
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Jiadong Bai
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Xinyuan Lin
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Xiaozhen Liu
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Texera (incubating) 1.2.0-incubating RC3 Hyukjin Kwon
• [D] Improve Workflow Runtime Observability with Execution Status and Flow Control Visualization [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Improve Workflow Runtime Observability with Execution Status and Flow Control Visualization [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Improve Workflow Runtime Observability with Execution Status and Flow Control Visualization [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Improve Workflow Runtime Observability with Execution Status and Flow Control Visualization [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Improve Workflow Runtime Observability with Execution Status and Flow Control Visualization [texera] via GitHub
• [FYI] Texera v1.2.0-incubating RC3 planned for July 13 Xuan Gu
  • Re: [FYI] Texera v1.2.0-incubating RC3 planned for July 13 Ali Risheh
• [D] Should CSV/JSONL scan fail loudly on rows that don't match the inferred schema? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Should CSV/JSONL scan fail loudly on rows that don't match the inferred schema? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Should CSV/JSONL scan fail loudly on rows that don't match the inferred schema? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Should CSV/JSONL scan fail loudly on rows that don't match the inferred schema? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Should CSV/JSONL scan fail loudly on rows that don't match the inferred schema? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Should CSV/JSONL scan fail loudly on rows that don't match the inferred schema? [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Should CSV/JSONL scan fail loudly on rows that don't match the inferred schema? [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Admin dashboard: monitoring and management of computing units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Admin dashboard: monitoring and management of computing units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Admin dashboard: monitoring and management of computing units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Admin dashboard: monitoring and management of computing units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Admin dashboard: monitoring and management of computing units [texera] via GitHub
• [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Proposal: Automatically terminate idle Kubernetes Computing Units [texera] via GitHub

• Earlier messages