Forgot to mention that you go ahead and create sub-tasks for TEZ-2595 ( or TEZ-2594 ) for your respective commits.
thanks — HItesh On Jul 7, 2015, at 1:57 PM, Hitesh Shah <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure. There are currently 4 files under tez-dist: > > LICENSE-full.txt > NOTICE-full.txt > LICENSE-minimal.txt > NOTICE-minimal.txt > > The structure I have followed is that for each unique license, I list the > jars that fall under that license. Using a command such as ‘ grep > "\*.[jar|war]" LICENSE-full.txt ‘ allows one to figure out which jars/wars > are already handled. > To reduce the size of the main LICENSE file, it might be better to put each > other individual license’s text into a separate file and link that from the > main one. However, this can be done at a later point. > > Helpful pointers: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201504.mbox/%3CCABJEuZf9toL8TyTfaM_bu4Ue%2BNKzWSQN8%2ByLex8CD7KRF_bY4w%40mail.gmail.com%3E > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201504.mbox/%3C43F91668-66B7-4CBD-9B76-3455F5473ED8%40classsoftware.com%3E > > @Prakash, given that you have already done this for the tez-ui earlier, would > you mind verifying the contents of the LICENSE and NOTICE for the minimal > tarball? > > For the full tarball, I have already done some initial work ( needs to be > verified though in any case). I have the split the list of the dependencies > that have yet to be looked at or need another look: > > @Jeff: > > activation-1.1.jar > aopalliance-1.0.jar > apacheds-i18n-2.0.0-M15.jar > apacheds-kerberos-codec-2.0.0-M15.jar > api-asn1-api-1.0.0-M20.jar > api-util-1.0.0-M20.jar > async-http-client-1.8.16.jar > curator-client-2.6.0.jar > curator-framework-2.6.0.jar > curator-recipes-2.6.0.jar > gson-2.2.4.jar > guava-11.0.2.jar > guice-3.0.jar > guice-servlet-3.0.jar > htrace-core-3.0.4.jar > > @Bikas: > > httpclient-4.2.5.jar > httpcore-4.2.4.jar > jackson-core-asl-1.9.13.jar > jackson-jaxrs-1.9.13.jar > jackson-mapper-asl-1.9.13.jar > jackson-xc-1.9.13.jar > javax.inject-1.jar > jaxb-api-2.2.2.jar > jaxb-impl-2.2.3-1.jar > jersey-client-1.9.jar > jersey-core-1.9.jar > jersey-guice-1.9.jar > jersey-json-1.9.jar > jettison-1.3.4.jar > jetty-6.1.26.jar > jetty-util-6.1.26.jar > jsr305-3.0.0.jar > > @Rajesh: > > leveldbjni-all-1.8.jar > log4j-1.2.17.jar > netty-3.9.2.Final.jar > paranamer-2.3.jar > protobuf-java-2.5.0.jar > servlet-api-2.5-20081211.jar > servlet-api-2.5.jar > slf4j-api-1.7.5.jar > slf4j-log4j12-1.7.5.jar > snappy-java-1.0.4.1.jar > stax-api-1.0-2.jar > stax-api-1.0.1.jar > xercesImpl-2.9.1.jar > xmlenc-0.52.jar > xz-1.0.jar > zookeeper-3.4.6.jar > > thanks for the help > — Hitesh > > On Jul 7, 2015, at 1:12 PM, Bikas Saha <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Could you please take a stab at dividing the license check work among the >> volunteers? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Hitesh Shah [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:39 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Branch for TEZ-2592? >> >> Thanks folks. >> >> I will get started on creating the branch and seeding it with an initial >> patch that I had. >> We can probably follow a commit then review process for this branch >> initially and do a full review of the licenses before the final merge to >> master. >> >> @Jeff, to answer your question, this branch would created from master. After >> a merge back to master, we can backport to 0.7 and use that for the first >> try for creating binary artifacts. >> >> thanks >> - Hitesh >> >> On Jul 7, 2015, at 2:10 AM, Rajesh Balamohan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1. I can help. >>> >>> ~Rajesh.B >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Prakash Ramachandran < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 can help >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/7/15, 5:00 AM, "Jianfeng (Jeff) Zhang" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> +1. I can help with manual license checks too. >>>>> >>>>> BTW, which branch will this base on ? 0.6 or 0.7 ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best Regard, >>>>> Jeff Zhang >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 7/7/15, 3:08 AM, "Bikas Saha" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1. I can help with the manual license checks. >>>>>> >>>>>> Folks, please also reply mentioning if you can volunteer with some >>>>>> manual license checks. >>>>>> >>>>>> Once we have a volunteer list, perhaps Hitesh could help divide the >>>>>> jars between volunteers so that we can make quick progress. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bikas >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Hitesh Shah [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 11:54 AM >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Branch for TEZ-2592? >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> TEZ-2592 is an umbrella jira to track the work needed to make it >>>>>> easier to generate binary artifacts for user convenience. Given the >>>>>> work involved, it will likely need help from multiple volunteers to >>>>>> vet all the dependencies/licenses, etc in addition to all the basic >>>>>> scripting work to help release managers. With that in mind, I >>>>>> propose that we create a branch for this work and start looking to >>>>>> progress on making it easier for users to deploy Tez in various >>>>>> environments without needing to go through the full build cycle. >>>>>> >>>>>> Comments? >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks >>>>>> - Hitesh >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ~Rajesh.B >> >
