This would be the right time to get rid of deprecated methods. I suspect we'll need to look at them on a case by case basis though. Do you have a list of these?
Anyone else has thoughts on releases? Thanks, Sid On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Bikas Saha <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. > > On release schedule, we could consider getting onto a time based release > schedule - e.g. a release every 4 months so there is a regular cadence of > bug fix releases at least. > > Should we remove any deprecations since 0.7 in 0.9 given a couple of > releases have passed? > > Bikas > > -----Original Message----- > From: Siddharth Seth [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 1:37 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9 > > There hasn't been any release for some time. > > 0.8 - I'd like to create a new release in the next 2 weeks. There's quite > a few bug fixes. TEZ-3244 would be a good candidate to get in so that > there's a consumable build. > > 0.9 - Already has changes for Fair custom data routing, Cartesian product, > quite a few UI enhancements. Two big items under development are the > Parallel edge between vertices and the Tez shuffle handler. Would like to > get thoughts on a release schedule for 0.9. > We could create a beta with the 2 pending items missing, and a non-beta > once the remaining 2 features go in (or by time). > Alternately, create a non-beta release around mid-end March - with > whichever features are available. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > Sid >
