Thank you for clarifying, Hitesh.
I've been excited that Hive and Pig folks will catch up with Tez changes.

Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Hitesh Shah <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Tsuyoshi,
>
> Short answer to your question is yes, the pig/hive folks should move to 0.3.0 
> sooner rather than later ( but there is no reason they cannot stick to 0.2.0 
> ). From the tez community point of view, given that we are still in the early 
> stages of the product, we would like to see a fast moving project and push 
> the onus on users to upgrade to newer versions to get both new features, perf 
> improvements as well as bug fixes. This policy will change however as both 
> Hive and Pig moves towards production-ready releases though.
>
> Having talked to both the Hive and Pig folks offline, here is what I know:
>
>   - Hive has been using the 0.2.0 release and will likely move to 0.3.0 given 
> that some of the new features such as Vertex Groups, custom edges are being 
> used by Hive in their tez branch.
>   - Pig currently uses the latest snapshots from the master branch and 
> depending on their release timelines, will move to either using the 0.3.0 
> release or 0.4.0 if it is available by then. Bikas is looking at addressing a 
> lot of the API cleanup for 0.4.0 though which the Pig folks will have to 
> handle if they move to 0.4.0.
>
> I have CC'ed some of the Hive and Pig folks if they would like to chime in.
>
> thanks
> -- Hitesh
>
> On Feb 18, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> About 0.3 release itself, LGTM :-) Let's go ahead.
>>
>> One my question is how to collaborate with application
>> developers like Hive or Pig project.
>> Should these developers be recommended to upgrade
>> from 0.2 to 0.3?
>> We should clarify the polity against the application developers
>> though I know Tez is in alpha stage. What do you think?
>>
>> Thanks, Tsuyoshi
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Hitesh Shah <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hello folks,
>>>
>>> Given that our last release was in early December, 2013, it seems like a 
>>> good time to target a new release. I believe most of the critical security 
>>> related fixes have gone in and the few that remain in TEZ-669 could be 
>>> targeted for a future release.
>>>
>>> I have marked a few jiras that could be considered blockers for a 0.3.0 
>>> release to ensure good usability ( the list is open for discussion - feel 
>>> free to add any other issues if you deem them to be blockers ):
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20TEZ%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC
>>>
>>> Once, these fixes go in, I can aim to make a release sometime next week.
>>>
>>> Comments/concerns/suggestions?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> -- Hitesh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> - Tsuyoshi
>



-- 
- Tsuyoshi

Reply via email to