[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12982815#action_12982815
]
Bryan Duxbury commented on THRIFT-883:
--------------------------------------
Yeah, I think we should aim to leave the BB unmodified after writing. I'm not
100% sure how we'll effect that just yet, but maybe something like the slice()
method can do the trick.
> Extend ByteBuffer support to non-array-backed ByteBuffers
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-883
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-883
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java - Library
> Affects Versions: 0.4
> Reporter: Bryan Duxbury
> Assignee: Bryan Duxbury
> Fix For: 0.7
>
> Attachments: TBinaryProtocol-writeBinary.patch
>
>
> Binary fields are backed by ByteBuffers that wrap byte arrays, and all the
> protocol code assumes that every ByteBuffer is of this type. However, now
> that the structs setters allow ByteBuffer arguments, it would be nice to
> support other kinds of ByteBuffers, like those that are allocated direct.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
