Yeah, to be honest, I though about that as well. I think that's a good thing to 
do. I'll look at it today.
________________________________
Von: Jens Geyer (JIRA)
Gesendet: 29.11.2012 01:44
An: dev@thrift.apache.org
Betreff: [jira] [Updated] (THRIFT-1767) unions can't have required fields


     [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-1767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jens Geyer updated THRIFT-1767:
-------------------------------

    Attachment: THRIFT-1767_unions_cant_have_required_fields.patch

> unions can't have required fields
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-1767
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-1767
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Delphi - Compiler
>    Affects Versions: 0.8, 0.9
>            Reporter: Jens Geyer
>            Assignee: Jens Geyer
>             Fix For: 1.0
>
>         Attachments: THRIFT-1767_unions_cant_have_required_fields.patch
>
>
> Required fields within unions should be treaten as optional, the union 
> construct would not make much sense otherwise.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to