I look at it today ________________________________ Von: ANTHONY MOLINARO Gesendet: 14.02.2014 19:45 An: dev@thrift.apache.org Betreff: Re: Problem pushing to master
Hi, I attached the patch to the ticket, once I get a +1 I'll figure out how to commit it. -Anthony On Feb 9, 2014, at 5:35 AM, Roger Meier <ro...@bufferoverflow.ch> wrote: > Hi Anthony > > I've fixed the wrong link on the http://thrift.apache.org/developers/ page. > I guess you did not set the git user to your apache id. > > Please upload a patch for review first, see > http://thrift.apache.org/docs/HowToContribute > > Other erlang issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=component%20%3D%20%22Erlang%20-%2 > 0Library%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20THRIFT%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unreso > lved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > regards > -roger > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ANTHONY MOLINARO [mailto:antho...@alumni.caltech.edu] > Sent: Sonntag, 9. Februar 2014 08:16 > To: dev@thrift.apache.org > Subject: Problem pushing to master > > Hi, > > I finally was getting around to pushing a change to the erlang lib, but was > running into issues. > > AFAIK, I still have commiter access, and I created a ticket > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2354 > > but this was the first time I actually tried to push something with git. > > The "general instructions" mentioned here > > http://thrift.apache.org/developers/ > > are all about svn, but there doesn't even appear to be an svn repo anymore. > > Anyway, I'm not sure what is preventing the commit, I just get a 500 error > > molinaro@renym:118> git remote -v > origin https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/thrift.git (fetch) origin > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/thrift.git (push) > molinaro@renym:119> git push Username for 'https://git-wip-us.apache.org': > djnym Password for 'https://dj...@git-wip-us.apache.org': > fatal: unable to access > 'https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/thrift.git/': The requested URL > returned error: 500 > > Anyone have any idea what I'm doing wrong? > > Thanks, > > -Anthony >
