Hi all,

Question 3: git am
 git format-patch -1
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches

Cited from the linked doc:

7) No MIME, no links, no compression, no attachments.  Just plain text.

[...], all patches should be submitting e-mail "inline".
WARNING:  Be wary of your editor's word-wrap corrupting your patch,
if you choose to cut-n-paste your patch.

I have a bad feeeling regarding that specific part. We already experience and waste time fighting strange problems from time to time, caused by incorrect EOL styles, and whitespace changes. Sending a patch as plain text mail sounds very much like adding a new problem source to the game. It probably works for Linux only projects, but Thrift is the exact opposite of $PLATFORM only, and we have to be careful with such things. However, getting a patch as file attachment is probably ok, as long as we have a reference to JIRA for everything. How can the latter be ensured?

JensG


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Roger Meier
Sent: Saturday, April 5, 2014 2:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [DISCUSS] contribution and commit messages

All,

We had several discussion about commit messages on multiple channels.
Let's discuss this here on the dev list.

Question 1: Documentation
merge HowToCommit + HowToContribute into /CONTRIBUTE.md
and include it easily with our brand new Apache CMS on the web site?

Question 2: Developer's Certificate of Origin
Today we have this commit style:
--- http://thrift.apache.org/docs/committers/HowToCommit ---
THRIFT-###:<Jira description>
Client: <component>
Patch: <Name of person contributing the patch>

Description of what was fixed or addressed.

<%
    if this is a github pull request then copy the below block
    from the GitHub email that came to dev@ list, this will
    automatically close the GitHub pull request
%>
Github Pull Request: This closes #XX
--- http://thrift.apache.org/docs/committers/HowToCommit ---
Hmm, I did something wrong on the Lua commit...sorry!

What do you think about git best practice known from other projects to
get *Developer's Certificate of Origin*, such as here:
- https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
- http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Patches

e.g. *git commit -s* automatically adds a Signed-off-by line to the
commit message.
    Signed-off-by: Patch Creator <[email protected]>

beside of the Signed-off-by tag the following are well known:
    Tested-by: Tester <[email protected]>
    Reviewed-by: Reviewer <[email protected]>
    Suggested-by: Idea Creator <[email protected]>
    Acked-by: Component Maintainer <[email protected]>


Question 3: git am
Would it make sense to start using this?

Question 4: patch creation
What about that workflow:
    git clone https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/thrift.git thrift
    cd thrift
    git pull origin master
    # create a local feature branch
    git checkout -b THRIFT-1681
    # make the changes and commit to your local feature branch
    git commit -a
    # format patch
    git format-patch -1
    # submit the patch or create a pull request


all the best!
roger
;-r

Reply via email to