Seems like we need to allow multiple .ref annotations for a single field. You may want an unordered_map with cpp, but a custom dictionary class in Java.
So this feels like it should be treated similarly to namespaces, where you can use one namespace for all the languages, but you can also have a different namespace per language. "Jens Geyer" <jensge...@hotmail.com> wrote on 04/16/2014 01:24:25 PM: > From: "Jens Geyer" <jensge...@hotmail.com> > To: <dev@thrift.apache.org>, > Date: 04/16/2014 01:24 PM > Subject: cpp.ref annotation - not only for cpp > > Hi all, > > my proposal would be to make the new cpp.ref annotation more global. > The same thing is needed at least in one other language, and there > may be more (disclaimer: I have not checked, how many or if any at > all). I think it is better to use one annotation instead of multiple > <language>.ref annotations. > > What do you think? > > Have fun, > JensG
